EmailManual
(4 comments, 46 posts)
This user hasn't shared any profile information
Home page: http://www.emailmanual.co.uk
Posts by EmailManual
Is Email Marketing a Conversation?
0I saw this “Is Email marketing a conversation?” blog post over at MarketingXD and thought it was worth a repost on Email Manual so with MarketingXD’s permission here it is.
An ongoing discussion in the industry regards whether or not email marketing can be a conversation. The notion that it should be a conversation has quickly evolved into what almost amounts to a philosophy for some. You will hear some very smart people evangelize this way of doing things.
Social Email Marketing
Leave the philosophy to people with more time. Your decision is about resources, image and marketing priorities
Resources: If you only have resources to do something very badly, then better not do it at all. This is a corollary of “do one thing well”. So if you’re very understaffed, don’t try to handle email replies.
Image: People don’t like “no-reply” email addresses, or statements like “please do not reply to this address as it is not monitored”. These are rather offensive and not even true, because all commercial email addresses should be monitored for some types of replies such as bounces. If you have to block most email replies, e.g. because of spam problems, then turn it into a positive by providing a reply form or public forum. If you don’t, then people will use unofficial channels such as Twitter.
A major advantage is that you stay in control of your image. There is (almost) no way of censoring tweets, or Facebook posts. But emails are already private. And if people are posting complaints in *your* forum on your site, then you can stop Google from indexing it (details) so the complaints get less exposure. We know of one very large company who set up a private complaints forum for exactly this reason.
Marketing Priorities: If you want to keep your customers engaged, and are emphasizing social marketing, then handling email replies is an essential part of the mix. If not, e.g. because people don’t make regular purchases of your type of product, then do the bare minimum.
If you found this post informative please do head across to the original site or find marketingXD on twitter.
Android overtakes Blackberry in market share worldwide and continues to gain on iOS.
1As a very brief follow up to Novembers post on smartphone trends worldwide I decided to revisit the stats.
Using Statcounter again to look at the last 6 months of mobile OS data worldwide reveals :-
1) Android has overtaken Blackberry marketshare based on monitored web traffic. Note this is different to number of handsets in use or new sales.
2) Symbian handsets are still very popular worldwide and really aren’t changing or gaining ground as fast as some of the others.
3) iOS e.g iPhone and iPad devices have actually lost ground over the past 6 months. Most likely due to the sheer growth of Android smartphones in the mid market handset range.
4) Microsoft Windows mobile 7 handsets have not yet started to register on Statscounters stats, this is on a par with the amount of marketshare I expected these phones to have. There has been no significant change in traffic coming from “other” handsets either so windows 7 mobile isn’t creeping up unnoticed.
Source: StatCounter Global Stats – Mobile OS Market Share
Are you due a new handset soon? What are you anticipating buying and what’s drawing you to that platform?
The month before Christmas, a poem for email marketers.
1
About this time last year I saw a Christmas Post on Email Karma, titled “twas the month before christmas, a poem“. It was enjoyable then and thought good enough to share this year on Email Manual in the Christmas rush to campaign with the aim of providing some light relief but also some home truths that should be remembered too.
‘Twas the month before Christmas, when all through the land,
marketers were scheming to hit year-end plans.
Their e-mails were designed in great detail and care,
in hopes that all of their customers soon would be there.
Mail the entire list. Mail them all!
Mail away! Mail away! Mail away all!”
The executives were nestled all snug in their beds,
with visions of Q4 revenue dancing in their heads.
When back in the office arose such a clatter,
that delivery support ran to see what was the matter?
Away to their reporting tools they flew like a flash,
investigating each client’s mailing to look for the trash.
The data before them on the newly sent mail
gave all indications of why they did fail.
When what to their wondering eyes should appear,
but a slew of bounce codes that no one would endear.
Unknown User! Inactive Account! Mailbox Doesn’t Exist!
Blocks from the ISPs were hard to resist.
If only they’d listened and segmented their data.
Their mailing would have been delivered, staying off of the ISP’s radar.
Relevance, hygiene, permission and more,
ultimately gets the campaign safely out the door.
Reach out to your clients now and give them a shout.
Make sure they understand what this is all about.
Eliminate unknown users, non-responders, and hard bounces alike,
and watch delivery and response rates soar and spike.
It is important to take heed of this trustworthy advice,
because the ISPs know if you’re naughty or nice.
During this important mailing season we must get it right.
Happy Holidays to all, and to all a good-night!
ESP’s judgement against blocklist spamhaus slashed to $27000
1In 2006 ESP (Email Service provider) e360 insight, who send emails on behalf of their clients sued blocklist/anti spam organisation spamhaus after it listed its domains/IPs as allegedly sending spam.
The UK based Spamhaus did not defend the case which was brought to the courts on the basis of loss of earnings and the ruling was made in their absence. Spamhaus was ordered to pay $11.7m in compensation to e360 Insight, pull the organisation’s blocklist listing, and post a notice stating that it was inaccurate and wrong to say e360 Insight was involved in sending spam.
Spamhaus ignored the ruling and e360 insight responded by calling on the court to order the domain registrars Tucows or ICANN to suspend the spamhaus domains which would have taken the whole blocklist offline however the court denied this request.
e360 claim that 3 billion out of the 6.6 billion emails it sent on behalf of clients were blocked as a direct result of the listing as such a large percentage of mail administrators use the spamhaus blocklist as a method of determining whether a particular email is spam or not.
In mid June 2010, the appeals court slashed the $11.7m ruling to just $27,002 after it said e360 insight had been unable to substantiate its claims for loss of earnings and that the method used to calculate the loss of earnings was unscientific and not backed up by expert opinion.
The $27k was made up of $27000 compensation for loss of one e360 client which works out to be one months additional work that e360 would have had if it were not for the blocklisting and for the loss of two further clients $1 per client was awarded.
The judge also turned down e360 insight’s request of an injunction preventing spamhaus from being able to list e360 again in the future.



